Students return back to school after lockdown, like many are doing across the United States (Won-Ki Min)
Students return back to school after lockdown, like many are doing across the United States

Won-Ki Min

PRO/CON: In-Person Learning

December 9, 2020

Is going back to learning in person during a global pandemic worth it? The Globe explores the pros and cons of going back to school.

PRO

With cautionary measures in place, the time has finally come for students to re-enter the classroom

Elementary+school+students+learn+at+school%2C+having+to+don+masks+and+keep+distance+to+stay+safe+during+this+pandemic

Jose M. Osorio / Chicago Tribune

Elementary school students learn at school, having to don masks and keep distance to stay safe during this pandemic

Considering that Clayton High School plans to return to a form of in-person learning on Monday, November 9, there are many events happening around us that could prevent this plan. In Mid-October, our school planned to return to in-person learning by following a hybrid schedule with one half of all students in the morning, and the other half in the afternoon.
This decision comes as the whole United States has been reaching some of its highest spikes of coronavirus, surpassing the single-day record in July. On October 23, 2020, the United States reported more than 83,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19. Like other states in the Midwest, Missouri has been one of the states that has been reaching single day records within the range of 2,000 to 3,000 cases a day.
Learning virtually was something that many schools including the Clayton School District have been doing since Mid-March, which was when coronavirus first began surging in the U.S. Virtual learning has continued into the 2020-2021 school year, with one positive being that all students and teachers can stay safe.
However, while learning from home does have clear health implications, there is also a strong argument for returning students to the school building. And learning in person is something that many students hope to return to, regardless of the pandemic that has been surging across the country.

When learning in the building, one positive is that students will have easy ability to get help from teachers. Even though they can also get help during virtual office hours, it is easier for them to reach out to their teacher in person, so that they can easily ask questions and possibly look at the paper work together at the same time.
Additionally, students will also get to see their friends every day, which most people look forward to easily being able to communicate with their friends again. For many students being able to be in person with friends again would be beneficial from a social and emotional perspective.
This outlines one of the greatest challenges that the pandemic has created for all of us, lack of socialization can lead to isolation and depression. Humans are social creatures, we are designed to interact with one another and not just throw screens. So in general, socializing with friends is healthy for everyone, as long as that isn’t happening in the classroom when you are supposed to be listening to the teacher. For the many schools that have reopened, this socialization aspect was a driving force behind those decisions.
A third positive of learning at school is that students can often learn more productively. In other words, students are usually more focused in the classroom than when they are just sitting at a desk in their bedroom.
When at home, students might often have their phones right next to them instead of away from them. In the classroom, students are forced to leave their phones in their backpacks instead of sitting on their desks, because teachers don’t allow phones to be out. Secondly, if you hear some of your family talking, your dog barking and any other loud noises, it distracts from your full ability to learn new things, and your full ability to pay attention in class. In the school environment, the distractions are kept to a minimum, and while there are some students who simply decide to not focus on the lesson, or stay focused in class, for students who want to be engaged, the setting is just more conducive to learning.

Students who struggle more will likely struggle more online”

— Susanna Loeb

“Students who struggle more will likely struggle more online,” said American education economist and Stanford University professor Susanna Loeb back in March 2020, when Clayton started virtual learning. For students who already struggle, virtual learning has been especially hard and being at school would be best for them as a learning environment.
So despite the different “hybrid” environment that we will encounter when returning to the school building, the benefit to learning will ultimately be worth the masks, social distancing and strange schedule.

About the Contributor
Photo of Charlie Miller
Charlie Miller, Reporter

This is Charlie's first year of being apart of the Globe at Clayton High School. He has the favorite hobby of traveling, mostly around the United States. Charlie has gone to many...

Leave a Comment

CON

While many students and parents are craving a return to normal, restarting in-person learning will hurt more than help

A+student+does+her+learning+from+at+home%2C+just+like+several+have+had+to+do+over+the+past+few+months

Haley Lewis

A student does her learning from at home, just like several have had to do over the past few months

With more than five months of online learning under their belts, students and teachers at CHS are preparing to return to school. Of course, just like when sports were about to begin, the potential restoration of in-person learning has sparked a large debate amongst Clayton residents.
Is going back to school really the best idea? Well, no. While many students are eager to return to a normal way of learning, the drawbacks of returning to an in-person learning experience are too much to ignore.
The penultimate reason for waiting to return to normal education is the coronavirus. Cases are rising all over the country, not to mention the spike in cases that we have seen in Missouri. We didn’t go back to school in August or September when the number of cases was much lower, and yet we’re planning a return now? The whole idea seems rushed and risky.
If the administration wasn’t being pressured to make a decision, maybe the return to school would be carefully thought out and safe, but for the moment, it seems like students are being hurled back into the classroom with little afterthought.
With hundreds of students entering the high school every day, it would be almost impossible to completely stop the spread of the virus within school walls. Of course, parents are being told that it will all be safe because kids will wear masks and classes will be smaller, but safety should be everyone’s biggest concern.
With countless hours spent together throughout the entire school year, it would be a miracle if not a single infection occurred between students. Especially since many students will assuredly not adhere to safety guidelines.
Of course, the students themselves will not be in harm’s way if this occurs, but their unsuspecting relatives will be. People have become so eager to return to school that they seem to have forgotten that the real victims of the virus are the elderly, not the students.

This not only applies to students but teachers as well. What happens if a teacher is high risk? Do they forfeit their job, teach from home, or will they be forced to put themselves in danger by teaching in person?
One of the major arguments for returning to school is the social interaction between students that has been missing the past few months. But the advocates of this idea have not really thought hard enough about what going back to school in November actually means.
For starters, only half of a grade level will be in the school at a time. This means only half of a given student’s friends and classmates will actually be able to interact with one another. Also, those interactions will be expected to be very minimal. Students will probably be separated completely during class time, there’s no ability to go off-campus, and there’s not even an option for students to lounge in the commons or library. For any returning CHS student, this sounds like a nightmare, but it will soon be a reality.

Many of the concerns with returning to school seem to be directed at students, but teachers also will be bearing a large burden.”

Many of the concerns with returning to school seem to be directed at students, but teachers also will be bearing a large burden. Every teacher will be expected to teach each class twice every day, not to mention the fact that a few of their students will be on a zoom call.

The fact that not all students will be returning to school is a major cause for concern for many teachers, as they will have to resort to an entirely online learning environment, to ensure that all students are getting equal opportunity in the classroom. Which begs the question, if we’re going back to school just to still use online learning, what’s even the point?
Returning to in-person learning sounds like a graceful return to normalcy, but in reality, we’d be stumbling blindly in the dark. Teachers and administrators have never been able to control the student body, and now it is believed that they will be able to control not only the students but also the spread of the coronavirus. To ensure comfort and safety, CHS should remain online for the foreseeable future.

About the Contributor
Photo of Max Keller
Max Keller, Reporter

 

Max Keller is a sophomore at CHS.  This is his first year on the Globe.  He is a reporter and enjoys writing for the news section. Outside of the Globe, he can be...

Leave a Comment

The Globe • Copyright 2021 • FLEX WordPress Theme by SNOLog in